Does Altruism Exist?: Culture, Genes, and the Welfare of Others (Foundational Questions in Science)
David Sloan Wilson
Language: English
Pages: 192
ISBN: 0300189494
Format: PDF / Kindle (mobi) / ePub
From an evolutionary viewpoint, Wilson argues, altruism is inextricably linked to the functional organization of groups. “Groups that work” undeniably exist in nature and human society, although special conditions are required for their evolution. Humans are one of the most groupish species on earth, in some ways comparable to social insect colonies and multi-cellular organisms. The case that altruism evolves in all social species is surprisingly simple to make.
Yet the implications for human society are far from obvious. Some of the most venerable criteria for defining altruism aren’t worth caring much about, any more than we care much whether we are paid by cash or check. Altruism defined in terms of thoughts and feelings is notably absent from religion, even though altruism defined in terms of action is notably present. The economic case for selfishness can be decisively rejected. The quality of everyday life depends critically on people who overtly care about the welfare of others. Yet, like any other adaptation, altruism can have pathological manifestations. Wilson concludes by showing how a social theory that goes beyond altruism by focusing on group function can help to improve the human condition.
Mad Science: The Nuclear Power Experiment
The Rise of Early Modern Science: Islam, China and the West
small geographical area and people speaking different languages routinely intermarry without the languages blending into a single language.9 The examples of accounting methods, perspectives, and languages make it easy to understand how different configurations of thought can be different but worthy of coexistence, and how they can be, but need not be, incommensurate. The concept of equivalence notes that different configurations of scientific thought, which are variously called theories,
but became a precursor of modern economic thought. For our purposes, we can note that real bees aren’t motivated by anything that remotely resembles personal greed. Mandeville can be forgiven for not being a bee biologist, but metaphors are powerful and this one set the field of economics on the wrong path. One way to recover is by asking what human societies and insect colonies such as beehives actually share in common, as we did in chapter 4 and will revisit later in this chapter. Smith
that they can spread, cancerlike, at the expense of society as a whole. We are currently witnessing this phenomenon with the spread of the “greed is good” worldview. Calling a worldview cancerous says nothing about the thoughts or intentions of its believers. To pick Greenspan as an example, by all accounts he is a decent man who thought that he was promoting the common good. During the widely reported congressional hearing that followed the 2008 financial crisis, he was genuinely dumbfounded
Assets Profile (DAP) to public school students in grades 6–12. The DAP was developed by a nonprofit organization called Search Institute that has been dedicated to promoting healthy youth development for more than fifty-years.3 The profile measures properties of individuals that contribute to their healthy development (internal assets) and social support from various sources such as family, neighborhood, school, religion, and extracurricular activities (external assets). Among the internal assets
to employ the design principles. But the fact that these programs worked well did not mean that they had become common educational practice. On the contrary, education in America (and many other countries) appears to be driven by forces that cause massive violations of the design principles. That was definitely the case for at-risk students in the city of Binghamton. Their experience at the Regents Academy would be very different from their experience at Binghamton’s single high school. To