Present Shock in Late Fifth-Century Greece

Present Shock in Late Fifth-Century Greece

Francis M. Dunn

Language: English

Pages: 256

ISBN: 0472116169

Format: PDF / Kindle (mobi) / ePub

Francis M. Dunn's Present Shock in Late Fifth-Century Greece examines the widespread social and cultural disorientation experienced by Athenians in a period that witnessed the revolution of 411 B.C.E. and the military misadventures in 413 and 404---a disturbance as powerful as that described in Alvin Toffler's Future Shock. The late fifth century was a time of vast cultural and intellectual change, ultimately leading to a shift away from Athenians' traditional tendency to seek authority in the past toward a greater reliance on the authority of the present. At the same time, Dunn argues, writers and thinkers not only registered the shock but explored ways to adjust to living with this new sense of uncertainty. Using literary case studies from this period, Dunn shows how narrative techniques changed to focus on depicting a world in which events were no longer wholly predetermined by the past, impressing upon readers the rewards and challenges of struggling to find their own way forward.

Although Present Shock in Late Fifth-Century Greece concentrates upon the late fifth century, this book's interdisciplinary approach will be of broad interest to scholars and students of ancient Greece, as well as anyone fascinated by the remarkably flexible human understanding of time.

Francis M. Dunn is Professor of Classics at the University of California, Santa Barbara. He is author of Tragedy's End: Closure and Innovation in Euripidean Drama (Oxford, 1996), and coeditor of Beginnings in Classical Literature (Cambridge, 1992) and Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature (Princeton, 1997).

"In this fascinating study, Francis Dunn argues that in late fifth-century Athens, life became focused on the present---that moving instant between past and future. Time itself changed: new clocks and calendars were developed, and narratives were full of suspense, accident, and uncertainty about things to come. Suddenly, future shock was now."
---David Konstan, John Rowe Workman Distinguished Professor of Classics and the Humanistic Tradition and Professor of Comparative Literature, Brown University

"In this fascinating work, Dunn examines the ways in which the Greeks constructed time and then shows how these can shed new light on various philosophical, dramatic, historical, scientific and rhetorical texts of the late fifth century. An original and most interesting study."
---Michael Gagarin, James R. Dougherty, Jr., Centennial Professor of Classics, the University of Texas at Austin

"Interesting, clear, and compelling, Present Shock in Late Fifth-Century Greece analyzes attitudes toward time in ancient Greece, focusing in particular on what Dunn terms 'present shock,' in which rapid cultural change undermined the authority of the past and submerged individuals in a disorienting present in late fifth-century Athens. Dunn offers smart and lucid analyses of a variety of complex texts, including pre-Socratic and sophistic philosophy, Euripidean tragedy, Thucydides, and medical texts, making an important contribution to discussions about classical Athenian thought that will be widely read and cited by scholars working on Greek cultural history and historiography."
---Victoria Wohl, Associate Professor, Department of Classics, University of Toronto


Expressions of Time in Ancient Greek (Cambridge Classical Studies)

Histories (Hackett Classics)

Plato's Erotic World: From Cosmic Origins to Human Death

History of Greek Culture

A Companion to Plutarch















uses of time are neither ‹xed nor natural but are subject to revision as the needs of a community change. Innovations and revisions continued down through the Hellenistic period. In the measurement of daily time, for example, the single most important innovation in the Greek world took place in the third century, when sundials marking the seasonal hours ‹rst became widespread. The traditional, agricultural markers of sunrise, ‹lling of the market, and high noon were thus supplemented by a

punished the Trojans, but which brought crushing pain to Greeks and Trojans alike (60–67). The moral ambivalence of the expedition to Troy is spelled out in the song that follows, in which the chorus dwells on the terrible price Agamemnon paid in sacri‹cing his daughter. 68 present shock in late fifth-century greece And when he put on the yoke of necessity, breathing his spirit’s evil swerve, impure and unholy, then his mind changed to utter ruthlessness. ......................... Her father

result, characters are not assimilated to the author’s point of view. The dramatic characters do not struggle, as Oedipus did, to reach an understanding of why things happened this way, and their blindness stands in stark contrast to the privileged understanding of the god on the machine. In the end, Oedipus lacks sight but, through suffering, has acquired insight or understanding; Euripidean characters, by contrast, are af›icted with the ordinary blindness of living in the present. The

explaining at some length how humans acquired the capacity to form cities. Unfortunately, we cannot know to what extent this speech is faithful to Protagoras’s actual views or to what extent it constitutes Platonic embellishment;9 moreover, what we have primarily addresses Plato’s question of whether knowledge can be taught. Protagoras begins by 158 present shock in late fifth-century greece describing the creation of humankind, explaining how Epimetheus, in doling out powers to all the

one. I shall here set out in greater detail the theoretical basis for the author’s view of change. The treatise begins with a bold and sophisticated challenge, announcing that all who have previously spoken or written on medicine have erred in two ways:28 their understanding of physiology rests on reductive suppositions, or ßB@2XFg4H; and their view of medical practice neglects the process of learning and acquiring skill. All who have tried to speak or write about medicine are clearly wrong

Download sample